Not Db2 13 yet. But ...
In the past (pre Db2 13) each module had a prefix which contains the RMID (FMID or PTF
which replaced the module). (I think this is what MEPL uses.) Try doing a seach on
SDSNLOAD for one of the module names that UI79956 replaces (listed in the APAR text)
and see what PTF last replaced it.
James Campbell
On 22 Jun 2022 at 16:01, Manoj Jadwani via Internation wrote:
> I understand your pain. I have been there not long ago when I started supporting project with missing Db2 CSI.
> Good thing is we have atleast Db2 code level now we can guess/base maintenance level to the PTF that introduced it.
>
> But I am with you on this and will vote on the idea , IBM should give a module which compiles list of PTF that Db2 has and keeps on updating that module with each maintenance level something of this sort.
>
> Regards,
> Manoj K Jadwani
>
> ------------------------------
> ManojJadwaniTCS
> ------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------
> Original Message:
> Sent: Jun 22, 2022 11:21 AM
> From: Emil Kotrc
> Subject: Db2 13 migration - AHA idea for the fallback SPE
>
> Sure, but if I run Db2 from deployment libraries, I have no CSI available. Obtaining such information is then more challenging, because I need to go back in time when the copy has been made, review the outputs, check the state of SMP/E at that time, etc. For me it would be much easier, if I can just simply ask Db2 itself if it is ready for the migration.
> Thanks,Emil.
>
>
>
>
> Original Message:
> Sent: 6/22/2022 10:18:00 AM
> From: Manoj Jadwani
> Subject: RE: Db2 13 migration - AHA idea for the fallback SPE
>
> What do you mean when you say "no indication" ?
> PH37108 is associated with PTF UI79956